Selection process for accepted abstracts
The sole decision for the selection of accepted abstracts is with the Scientific Committee of ACOSCM. All submitted abstracts will be carefully reviewed and presented to the full committee. If more abstracts will be submitted for the available presentation slots around the four themes, all abstracts related to one theme will be ranked by the committee. The top ranked abstracts will be accepted and the authors notified respecively. The ranking structure will be decided by majority vote amongst the members of the Scientific Committee if required.
Assessment criteria for submitted abstracts
Title:
Authors:
Scores
______________________________________________________________
Key: 1 = unsatisfactory 2=satisfactory, 3=Good
|
S/N |
Scale |
Rating |
|
|
1 |
Covers an area along the conference sub-themes |
|
|
|
2 |
Observes abstract structure (objective, method for data collection and analysis, findings and recommendations) |
|
|
|
3 |
Use of appropriate language to communicate. |
|
|
|
4 |
Possible contribution to theory/knowledge/policy/practice |
|
|
|
Comments to Author:
|
|||
|
|
Decision on the abstract will depend on the scores |
||
Conference Sub-Themes
1. Examining supply chain resilience and sustainability in agriculture, healthcare and energy supply chains
· Risk management and resilience
· Innovative industry-specific solutions
2. Exploring the potential of Circular Economy in Logistics and Supply Chain Management for business sustainability
· Pathways to sustainable logistics and supply Chain Management solutions
· Transforming towards a circular economy
3. Exploring the role of digitalization in Logistics and Supply Chain Management
· Implementation of new technologies
· Exploring sensible use cases for innovative technologies